<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[U.S. Policy Pro]]></title><description><![CDATA[U.S. Policy Pro provides nonpartisan analysis of trending legislation, Supreme Court rulings, and Executive Orders—keeping you informed on critical policy developments.]]></description><link>https://www.uspolicy.pro</link><generator>Substack</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 11:57:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.uspolicy.pro/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><copyright><![CDATA[U.S. Policy Pro]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><webMaster><![CDATA[uspolicypro@substack.com]]></webMaster><itunes:owner><itunes:email><![CDATA[uspolicypro@substack.com]]></itunes:email><itunes:name><![CDATA[Policy Pro]]></itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author><![CDATA[Policy Pro]]></itunes:author><googleplay:owner><![CDATA[uspolicypro@substack.com]]></googleplay:owner><googleplay:email><![CDATA[uspolicypro@substack.com]]></googleplay:email><googleplay:author><![CDATA[Policy Pro]]></googleplay:author><itunes:block><![CDATA[Yes]]></itunes:block><item><title><![CDATA[5 CRA Resolutions: Glen Canyon ORVs, Longfin Smelt, and California’s Emissions Waivers in the Crosshairs]]></title><description><![CDATA[H.J.Res. 60, H.J.Res. 78, H.J.Res 87, 88, 89 - Proposed CRA Resolutions on Environmental Regulations]]></description><link>https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/5-cra-resolutions-glen-canyon-orvs</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/5-cra-resolutions-glen-canyon-orvs</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Policy Pro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 21:01:40 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/24621eb4-6812-4eaf-89b9-92d5e5c9b4aa_1024x1024.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congress is currently considering several Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions that would overturn recent environmental regulations. These resolutions target rules ranging from public land use in a national recreation area to wildlife protections and vehicle emission standards. Below, we present a detailed, non-partisan analysis of each resolution&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/5-cra-resolutions-glen-canyon-orvs">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[How the Budget Resolution Could Reshape U.S. Taxes and Spending]]></title><description><![CDATA[H.Con.Res. 14 (119th) - The 2025-2034 Budget Resolution]]></description><link>https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/how-the-budget-resolution-could-reshape</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/how-the-budget-resolution-could-reshape</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Policy Pro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 16:25:42 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/9ee42f7b-bb3c-45b1-8f3b-f7a24a6ec172_1024x1024.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Summary</h2><p>H. Con. Res. 14 is the concurrent resolution establishing the federal budget for Fiscal Year 2025 and setting budgetary levels for FY2026 through FY2034. It was introduced as the House&#8217;s budget blueprint for the 119th Congress. The resolution&#8217;s <strong>main purpose</strong> is to lay out Congress&#8217;s fiscal plan for the next decade &#8211; specifying targets for revenues&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/how-the-budget-resolution-could-reshape">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Presidential Immunity Addressed: Supreme Court Defines Boundaries in Landmark Trump v. United States Decision]]></title><description><![CDATA[Trump v. United States]]></description><link>https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/presidential-immunity-addressed-supreme</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/presidential-immunity-addressed-supreme</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Policy Pro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 15:01:34 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/5c305047-7ada-44ee-aca4-21b45d62796b_2550x1700.webp" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The case <em>Trump v. United States</em> arises from a federal grand jury indictment of former President Donald J. Trump on four counts related to his actions following the November 2020 presidential election. The indictment alleges that Trump conspired to overturn the election results by spreading knowingly false claims of election fraud to obstruct the collect&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/presidential-immunity-addressed-supreme">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Reverses Chevron Doctrine: Reasserting Judicial Authority in Statutory Interpretation]]></title><description><![CDATA[Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo]]></description><link>https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/supreme-court-reverses-chevron-doctrine</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/supreme-court-reverses-chevron-doctrine</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Policy Pro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2024 14:43:14 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/0eaf0855-eaa2-4370-9a82-3ee1ad1b9ef8_864x481.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The case of <strong>Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo</strong> arose from a challenge by Atlantic herring fishermen against the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The NMFS had implemented a rule under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) requiring these fishermen to pay for at-sea observers mandated by a fishery management plan, d&#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/supreme-court-reverses-chevron-doctrine">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Supreme Court's Interpretation of Firearm Regulations in United States v. Rahimi]]></title><description><![CDATA[How does the Second Amendment intersect with Domestic Violence Restraining Orders]]></description><link>https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/the-supreme-courts-interpretation</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/the-supreme-courts-interpretation</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Policy Pro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 17:28:05 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/03b34ac2-ebfd-4dbe-aca2-c0a57d5897a8_537x420.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court opinion in the case of <em>United States v. Rahimi</em> involves the interpretation of the Second Amendment in relation to firearm possession by individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders. Here is a summary and analysis of the key points from the opinion:</p><h3>Case Background:</h3><ul><li><p><strong>Respondent</strong>: Zackey Rahimi</p></li><li><p><strong>Statute Involved</strong>: 18 U.S.C. &#167;922(&#8230;</p></li></ul>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/the-supreme-courts-interpretation">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mind Over Matter: The Supreme Court's Stance on Expert Testimony in Drug Trafficking Cases]]></title><description><![CDATA[DIAZ v. UNITED STATES]]></description><link>https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/mind-over-matter-the-supreme-courts</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/mind-over-matter-the-supreme-courts</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Policy Pro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2024 18:23:34 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9455239d-2d40-48ca-b45f-9cef2e7da5c2_3288x3288.jpeg" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in <strong>Delilah Guadalupe Diaz v. United States, No. 23-14</strong> presents a significant interpretation of Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) and its application to expert testimony in criminal cases. This case centers on the conviction of Delilah Diaz for importing methamphetamine into the United States, with the crux of the legal debate &#8230;</p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/mind-over-matter-the-supreme-courts">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Coming soon]]></title><description><![CDATA[This is U.S. Policy Pro.]]></description><link>https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/coming-soon</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/coming-soon</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Policy Pro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:23:35 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!OrZ_!,w_256,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F81aa8554-a6d2-424c-8272-4ce5a3bbe1f5_1280x1280.png" length="0" type="image/jpeg"/><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is U.S. Policy Pro.</p><p class="button-wrapper" data-attrs="{&quot;url&quot;:&quot;https://www.uspolicy.pro/subscribe?&quot;,&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Subscribe now&quot;,&quot;action&quot;:null,&quot;class&quot;:null}" data-component-name="ButtonCreateButton"><a class="button primary" href="https://www.uspolicy.pro/subscribe?"><span>Subscribe now</span></a></p>
      <p>
          <a href="https://www.uspolicy.pro/p/coming-soon">
              Read more
          </a>
      </p>
   ]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>